A Multi-Actor Collaborative Perspective: Investigating the Influence Pathways of Social Media Communication Compliance in the Context of the 15th Five-Year Plan
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.71204/jgemqg28Keywords:
Multi-stakeholder Collaboration, Social Media, Communication Compliance, Platform Governance, 15th Five-Year PlanAbstract
With the development of the digital economy and the proliferation of social media platforms, the compliance of corporate communication activities on these platforms has increasingly become a focal point of attention for both society and academia. Based on the theory of multi-stakeholder collaborative governance, this paper constructs a theoretical model examining how platform policy implementation, platform control intensity, and public and corporate compliance awareness influence the compliance of social media communication. It also delves into the core pathways and underlying mechanisms affecting social media communication compliance within the context of the 15th Five-Year Plan era. The findings reveal that the degree of platform policy implementation directly and positively influences communication compliance. Platform control intensity mediates the relationship between platform policy implementation and communication compliance. Meanwhile, public compliance awareness and corporate compliance awareness moderate the relationship between platform policy implementation and communication compliance. This study explains the formation mechanism of social media communication compliance from a multi-stakeholder collaborative perspective, providing theoretical foundations and practical insights for improving platform governance systems and enhancing the level of compliant communication by platforms and enterprises.
References
Bloch-Wehba, H. (2018). Global platform governance: Private power in the shadow of the state. Southern Methodist University Law Review, 72(1), 27–84.
Crawford, K., & Gillespie, T. (2016). What is a flag for? Social media reporting tools and the vocabulary of complaint. New Media & Society, 18(3), 410–428.
Einwiller, S. A., & Kim, S. (2020). How online content providers moderate user-generated content to prevent harmful online communication: An analysis of policies and their implementation. Policy & Internet, 12(2), 184–203.
Flew, T. (2021). Regulating platforms. John Wiley & Sons.
Helberger, N., Pierson, J., & Poell, T. (2018). Governing online platforms: From contested to cooperative responsibility. The Information Society, 34(1), 1–14.
Kong, X. (2020). A public law reflection on the regulatory structure of online platform information content. Global Legal Review, (2), 5–22.
Liu, Q. (2020). The public nature of online platforms and its realization: A perspective from e-commerce platforms. Legal Studies, (2), 42–60.
Standing Committee of the National People’s Congress. (2026). Cybersecurity law of the People’s Republic of China (revised edition).
State Administration for Market Regulation. (2026). Administrative measures for the supervision of online trading platform rules.
State Internet Information Office. (2019). Regulations on the ecological governance of online information content.
Van Dijck, J., Poell, T., & De Waal, M. (2018). The platform society: Public values in a connective world. Oxford University Press.
Wang, Y. (2024). Public-private dual regulation of private power on social platforms. Law and Business Studies, 41(1), 98–112.
Xi, J. (2020). On the Party’s propaganda and ideological work. Central Literature Publishing House.
Xiao, H., & Li, P. (2019). Ecological governance of social responsibility in platform-based enterprises. Management World, (4), 120–133.
Xiao, X., & Ding, T. (2015). Multi-stakeholder collaboration: A new approach to online public opinion governance. Journal of Zhengzhou Light Industry University (Social Sciences Edition), 16(3), 48–52.
Zhang, Z., & Ran, Z. (2022). China’s internet platform governance: Pathways, outcomes, and characteristics. Journal of Journalism and Communication Studies, (5), 57–69.
Zhou, Y., & Ji, S. (2016). Research on constructing a collaborative governance model for multiple stakeholders in cyberspace. E-Government, (7), 2–11.
Zhou, Y., & Zhang, X. (2022). Theoretical framework and implementation strategies for holistic intelligent governance of cyberspace information content ecological security risks. Library and Information Work, 66(5), 44–52.
Zuo, Y. (2022). Publicness of social platforms and its regulation: Lessons from the U.S. experience. Tsinghua Law Review, (4), 85–102.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Yingnuo Qi, Yunhui Cheng (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
