Research on the Impact of ESG Rating Divergence on Audit Fees

Yifei Yin

doi:10.71204/cp8dn158

Authors

Yifei Yin Hebei University Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.71204/cp8dn158

Keywords:

ESG Rating Divergence, Audit Fees, Information Risk

Abstract

ESG rating differences reflect the differences in the evaluation of ESG performance of the same enterprise by different rating agencies, which will have an impact on audit institutions based on the theory of information asymmetry. Based on the sample of A-share listed companies in China from 2019 to 2023, this paper confirms that there is a significant positive correlation between ESG rating divergence and audit fees. The paper proposes that information risk level of enterprises is the mediating mechanism underlying the effect of ESG rating divergence on audit fees. However, the mediating effect is nonsignificant. The author suggests that the theoretical mismatch of proxy variables and the regulatory effect of China's special situation may explain the nonsignificant findings. Heterogeneity analysis shows that among enterprises belonging to lightly polluting industries, ESG rating divergence has a more significant impact on audit fees. The conclusions not only enrich the economic consequences of ESG rating divergence, expand the theoretical understanding of the factors affecting audit fees, but also provide an important reference for ESG rating optimization, enterprise risk reduction and regulatory authorities to improve the information disclosure system.

References

Akerlof, G. A. (1970). The Market for “Lemons”: Quality Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 84(3), 488-500.

Chen, Y. S. (2012). The Centrality of Independent Directors in the Network and the Quality of Corporate Information Disclosure. Auditing Research, (05), 92-100.

Chen, Y., Eshleman, J. D., & Soileau, J. S. (2022). Board gender diversity and audit fees. Accounting Horizons, 36(2), 1-23.

Clarkson, P. M., Li, Y., Richardson, G. D., & Vasvari, F. P. (2013). Revisiting the relation between environmental performance and environmental disclosure: An empirical analysis. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 38 (1), 1-16.

Drempetic, S., Klein, C., & Zwergel, B. (2020). The Influence of Firm Size on the ESG Score: Corporate Sustainability Ratings Under Review. Journal of Business Ethics, 167(2), 333-360.

Fan, Y. (2024). How Does ESG Rating Divergence Affect Enterprise Green Innovation? Friends of Accounting, (21), 81-89.

Feng, Y. T., Guo, X. M., & Zeng, X. L. (2024). ESG Information Disclosure and ESG Rating Divergence: Consensus or Dissent? - Also on the Institutional Norms of ESG in China. Accounting Research, (01), 49-63.

Francis, J. R. (2011). A framework for understanding and researching audit quality. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 30(2), 125-152.

Guo, B. C. (2009). An Empirical Study on the Influencing Factors of Audit Pricing in China. The Theory and Practice of Finance and Economics, 30(01), 61-64.

Hay, D., Knechel, W. R., & Wong, N. (2006). Audit fees: A meta-analysis of the effect of supply and demand attributes. Contemporary Accounting Research, 23(1), 141-191.

He, T. M., Li, Y. P., Wang, Z., et al. (2023). Does ESG Rating Divergence Increase the Voluntary Information Disclosure of Listed Companies? Accounting and Economics Research, 37 (03), 54-70.

Li, C., Liu, W., & You, J. X. (2021). Team Synergy of Executive Compensation Incentives and Audit Fees. Auditing Research, (03), 72-83.

Li, L., & Zhi, Q. (2024). Research on the Impact of Enterprise ESG Rating Divergence on Audit Input. Friends of Accounting, 1 - 10.

Liang, R. X., & Li, Y. (2022). Do Interlocking Shareholders Affect Auditors' Pricing Decisions? Accounting Research, (06), 165-177.

Lin, W. F., & Ao, X. B. (2018). Enterprise Credit Rating and Audit Fees. Auditing Research, (03), 95-103.

Liu, X. Q., Yang, Q. Q., & Hu, J. (2023). ESG Rating Divergence and Stock Price Synchronicity. China Soft Science, (08), 108-120.

Liu, Y. N., & Zhang, Y. C. (2025). Can ESG Rating Divergence Affect Auditors' Decisions? - Evidence from the Perspective of Audit Opinions. Journal of Nanjing Audit University, 22(02), 35-44.

Lü, M. K., & Ran, M. D. (2012). Does Media Coverage Affect Auditors' Professional Judgment? An Empirical Analysis from the Perspective of Earnings Management Risk Judgment. Auditing Research, (06), 82-89.

Pinto, I., Morais, A. I., & Gomes, D. (2022). The Impact of ESG Information on Audit Risk Assessments: Evidence from European Banks. Journal of International Financial Management & Accounting, 33(3), 456-481.

Simunic, D. A. (1980). The Pricing of Audit Services: Theory and Evidence. Journal of Accounting Research, 18 (1), 161-190.

Su, C., & Ma, Y. (2025). ESG Rating Divergence and Stock Price Crash Risk: Whose Responsibility? Friends of Accounting, (05), 94-102.

Wang, S. H., & Yang, Y. J. (2009). Internal Audit Quality and Audit Fees - Evidence from Chinese Listed Companies. Auditing Research, (05), 65-73.

Wang, X. Y., Gao, X., & He, J. (2018). Annual Report Risk Information Disclosure and Audit Fees - From the Perspective of Text Cosine Similarity. Auditing Research, (05), 98-104.

Wang, Y. L., Chen, J. X., & Lin, X. Q. (2024). ESG Rating Divergence and Audit Fees. Finance and Accounting Monthly, 45(07), 84-90.

Wang, Y., Zhang, Y. M., & Hou, D. S. (2022). Does the ESG Performance of Enterprises Affect Audit Opinions? Auditing & Finance Research, 37(05), 54-64.

Wu, L. N. (2003). An Analysis of the Impact of Earnings Management on Audit Fees - Evidence from the Disclosure of Initial Audit Fees of Chinese Listed Companies. Accounting Research, (12), 39-44.

Xiao, F., Lan, F. Y., Shi, W., et al. (2021). Does the ESG Rating of Listed Companies Affect Audit Fees? - A Quasi-Natural Experiment Based on ESG Rating Events. Auditing Research, (03), 41-50.

Zhang, Y. Q., Yang, H. Y., & Zhang, X. Y. (2023). ESG Rating Divergence and Cost of Debt Capital. The Journal of Finance and Economics, 15(04), 22-43.

Zhao, L., & Lu, Y. F. (2024). ESG Rating Divergence and Enterprise Operational Risk. Technology Economics, 43(07), 98-109.