The Impact of Marketing Model Transformation on Corporate Financial Performance: A Case Study of Luckin Coffee

Authors

  • Xinyue Pang Hebei University Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.71204/1gv08j64

Keywords:

Luckin Coffee, Marketing Model Transformation, Financial Performance, Digital Marketing, Asset-Light Operation, Coffee Industry

Abstract

This paper takes Luckin Coffee as the research object, focusing on its two key transformations of marketing models from "subsidy-driven expansion by traffic" to "digital value refinement". It systematically analyzes the transmission mechanism of marketing changes on financial performance. Through literature review, case comparison and quantitative analysis of financial indicators, combined with the real financial data of Luckin Coffee from 2022 to 2024, this paper evaluates the performance changes from four dimensions: profitability, operating capacity, solvency and development capacity, and makes a horizontal comparison with Starbucks' experiential marketing model of "the third place". The study finds that after abandoning extensive subsidies and shifting to value-based marketing featuring product innovation, private domain operation and asset-light expansion, Luckin Coffee has achieved continuous improvement in revenue, gross profit and net profit margin, realizing the leap from loss to high-quality profitability. Relying on brand premium, Starbucks maintains stable profitability, but its growth elasticity and operational efficiency are significantly lower than those of Luckin Coffee. This paper reveals the core logic of digital marketing, cost control and the balance between scale and profitability, providing theoretical and practical references for marketing-finance synergy of new consumer chain enterprises.

References

Chen, Y. T. (2023). Subsidy marketing, cost control and corporate financial risk—Taking Luckin Coffee as an example. Modern Economics, 3, 76–79.

Huang, X. (2023). Research on the correlation between marketing expense control and financial performance. Finance & Economy, 10, 135–137.

Kotler, P. (2021). Marketing management (17th ed.). Beijing, China: Peking University Press.

Li, J. (2022). The impact of digital marketing on corporate profitability—Empirical evidence from new retail enterprises. Communications of Finance and Accounting, 12, 112–116.

Li, M. Z. (2023). Layout in sinking markets and development capacity of new consumers. Modern Business, 6, 41–44.

Liu, S. Q. (2022). Comparison of marketing models and performance differences of chain coffee enterprises—Luckin vs Starbucks. Journal of Commercial Economics, 18, 90–92.

Ma, Y. (2023). The impact of hit products on the performance of fast-moving consumer goods enterprises—Taking Luckin's Jiangxiang Latte as an example. Market Weekly, 1, 32–35.

Porter, M. (2020). Competitive strategy. Beijing, China: Huaxia Publishing House.

Sun, Y. (2022). Experiential marketing and financial performance evaluation of Starbucks. Chinese and Foreign Entrepreneurs, 15, 23–26.

Tian, T. (2023). Financial restoration in enterprise strategic transformation—A case analysis of Luckin Coffee. Audit & Finance, 4, 52–55.

Wang, H. Y. (2023). A case study on business model reconstruction and financial performance improvement of Luckin Coffee. Enterprise Reform and Management, 5, 68–70.

Zhang, L. (2022). The impact of private domain traffic operation on revenue and stickiness of retail enterprises. China Circulation Economy, 33, 102–105.

Zhang, M. (2023). Research on marketing transformation and financial performance of new consumer brands. Commercial Accounting, 8, 45–49.

Zhao, J. (2022). Marketing innovation and financial synergy of new retail enterprises under the digital background. Price Monthly, 7, 55–60.

Zhou, L. (2022). The impact of asset-light operation on financial indicators of consumer enterprises. Business Observer, 29, 88–91.

Downloads

Published

2026-04-29

How to Cite

The Impact of Marketing Model Transformation on Corporate Financial Performance: A Case Study of Luckin Coffee. (2026). Accounting, Marketing and Organization, 2(1), 16-28. https://doi.org/10.71204/1gv08j64

Similar Articles

1-10 of 16

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.